President Donald Trump’s directive to dismantle the U.S. Education Department carries significant implications.
The Republican president contends that the federal agency has not enhanced student performance and is superfluous in a system where states and local districts largely govern education, from funding to staffing and curriculum choices.
For years, conservative activists have advocated for the elimination of this agency, established by Congress in 1979. As Trump reshapes the federal landscape, he has criticized the department for being wasteful and for propagating “woke” concepts such as diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, as well as protections for transgender students.
The department has been primarily responsible for oversight, enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and allocating financial assistance to schools catering to low-income students and those with disabilities. It is important to note that federal funding accounts for a relatively small segment, about 14%, of public school budgets.
The Impact of Trump’s Order on American Families and Educators
In the immediate future, students, teachers, and parents will likely experience minimal changes. However, the long-term effects are more challenging to forecast.
A key factor is how Education Secretary Linda McMahon will reassign the essential roles of the department to other governmental sectors, including state administrations.
The primary concern revolves around how states will allocate the federal funds provided for assisting students who are disadvantaged, disabled, or learning English and require additional support. Many school districts with limited property tax resources, particularly in rural areas, rely heavily on these funds to pay educators, operate transportation, and secure classroom technology.
In states such as Mississippi and Alaska, this funding covers over 20% of the costs for school districts. Advocates express concern that, without federal oversight, state officials could redirect the funds to other priorities, such as vouchers for private school attendance.
What about student loans? Should
aspiring college students still complete the FAFSA?
The Trump administration’s prior cuts to the Education Department have resulted in the reduction of hundreds of staff and contracts vital to maintaining the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) website and assisting users with the intricate application process. Despite these cuts, McMahon has stated that federal programs will be preserved.
On Friday, Trump announced that the Small Business Administration would assume control of the $1.6 trillion federal student loan portfolio. Conservative figures, including former Trump Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, have suggested the establishment of a semi-private bank to manage loans.
Users should anticipate potential disruptions. The StudentAid.gov website experienced an outage lasting several hours last week as the remaining staff attempted to resolve the issue.
Will public schools continue to provide meals for children?
School meal programs rely on funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, so they remain unaffected by Trump’s decision to eliminate the Education Department. However, the USDA has discontinued a $1 billion initiative from the pandemic era that supported schools and food banks in purchasing local, fresh produce.
What is the timeline for the Education Department’s potential closure?
States and various organizations are preparing to file lawsuits to prevent the dismantling of the department, which could delay progress.
Completely abolishing the department would necessitate legislative action from Congress. Republicans are proposing bills to eliminate the agency but are facing significant opposition from Democrats.
For now, Trump still has plans for the department. While ordering its closure, he has instructed the agency to identify and penalize schools promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
___
The Associated Press’s education reporting is supported by several private foundations. The AP maintains full editorial control over its content. For information on the AP’s standards regarding partnerships with philanthropic organizations, and to view a list of its supporters and areas of funded coverage, please visit AP.org.
